Nosferatu
Warning : Major spoilers ahead for NosferatuRobert Eggers ' Gothic horror movieNosferaturevived one of cinema ’s oldest and most iconic monsters , which is itself an reading of the classic lamia Dracula , and in doing so invite comparisons between the two revulsion icons . As the titulary lamia , Bill Skarsgård bring a completely novel look and personality to the well - established theatrical role , reigniting the panic that pervades vampire lore . The shrieking king ’s rendition is vastly dissimilar from theother doer who have played Count Orlok , and calls into question how far off it is from the baseline character of Dracula .
WhileNosferatu : A Symphony of Horrorand , by denotation , Count Orlok , are establish off the novelDracula , the original iteration of the bat - like Transylvanian noble had several noticeable differences from the literary vampire , both in appearance and in power . Robert Eggers ' Count Orlokmaintains many of the traits from F.W. Murnau ’s original Orlok , but the previous version displays some brand - raw characteristics and superpower that neither the original Orlok nor Dracula had . There are 10 fundamental difference to point to between the typical delineation of Dracula and Robert Eggers ' Count Orlok .
Robert Eggers breaks down Count Orlok ’s fate in Nosferatu ’s ending , comparing it to both the original silent motion-picture show and larger lamia mythology .
10Facial Features
Dracula’s Canines Are Pointed, While Orlok Has A Mouthful Of Dagger-Like Teeth
Many of the stereotypical lamia image were born out of Bela Lugosi ’s iconic portrait of Count Dracula in the original 1931 Universal Studios movieDracula , which was a commercial-grade and decisive success and was wildly democratic . As a effect , most cinematic depicting of Dracula , and pop out culture ’s range of a function of vampires in universal , boast the trademark extended , sharp canine tooth , along with a pallid complexion and pointed auricle . Lugosi ’s cinematic portrayal of Dracula did n’t really admit any fangs , but the notion of a vampire ’s sting push the trope into existence in later portrayals .
Nosferatu- Key Details
Director
Custom image by Yailin Chacon
Release Date
Budget
Box Office Gross
Nosferatu is a remake of the 1922 silent film of the same name from director F. W. Murnau. Robert Eggers is crafting his own version of the story for the reboot as writer and director, with Bill Skarsgård stepping into the shoes of Count Orlok. Nosferatu tells the tale of a young woman who falls victim to a vampire utterly infatuated with her.
RT Tomatometer Score
RT Popcornmeter Score
Robert Eggers
December 25th , 2024
$ 50 million
$ 40 million ( proj . five - Clarence Shepard Day Jr. opening )
87 %
76 %
Ironically , Eggers ' Count Orlok shares some features with the literary depicting of Draculathat most cinematic adaptations do not . For exercise , Bram Stoker ’s original grapheme disport a white mustache , which is closer to therobust dark mustache that Orlok wears . Orlok does have pointed ears , but they ’re hidden under the big pelt lid he wears . His skin colour is sure enough pale , but that ’s due to the paper of his body as opposed to a design selection .
9Body Composition
Orlok Is A Reanimated Corpse, While Dracula Is An Undead Creature
Vampires are traditionally referred to as the " undead " , and that ’s for sure a part of the original story of Dracula . Count Dracula isa centuries - old Transylvanian Lord who is fundamentally infected with a vampiric disease , which is why he can pass the consideration along to others . Orlok , on the other hired hand , follow the more traditional Eastern European folklore definition of vampire , which is that they are corpse - like , nearer to zombie spirit than Bela Lugosi ’s clean - cut blue blood .
InNosferatu , it ’s briefly explained thatOrlok was an evil sorceror whose soul was sent back to its soundbox by the Devil himself , make him a literal stiff that walks . It explain why his intact physical structure is skeletal and rot ; the back of his head even has bare skull pearl and what seems to be exposed mental capacity tissue paper . In that mode , Orlok is unequaled among major feature film depictions of vampires , and of Dracula / Orlok specifically .
8Human Appearance
Dracula Easily Passes For A Human, While Orlok Is A Distinctly Inhuman Creature
One of the most important differences between Dracula and Count Orlok is that Dracula very easily passes for a human being . Some of his feature film , such as the traditionally pointed ears , are strange , but do n’t do anything to draw suspicion about his true nature . That allows him to get close to victim , and even earn their trust with his charm and manners . Orlok , on the other hand , is so outwardly evil and clearly inhumanthat it ’s insufferable for him to pass as one . He had to hide out his hunch over , skeletal figure under robes , heavy clothes , and a orotund hat .
7Bite Location
Orlok Bites The Chest To Feed, While Dracula Bites The Neck
Dracula , and most cinematic vampires , famously fertilise on victims by biting their necks . There are major blood vas there , and the marks are gentle to hide with a collar or something standardised , so it makes perfectly ordered good sense . Eggers ' Count Orlok notably feeds on victims by sting their chestand drinking from the wound . It ’s another alteration that Eggers made to keep up the vampire ’s origin in real - world folklore ; the feeling in vampires was accept out of conditions like sleep palsy which involve pressure on the chest , so it was thought vampires sought to prey off the heart .
6Bite Effects
Dracula’s Bites Create Other Vampires, While Orlok’s Bites Do Not
Part of what makes Dracula such a menace both in the novel and in cinematic adaptations is his ability to produce other vampire with his bite . By biting victims , he is surpass on the vampiric disease that turns a normal person into a fauna of the night , not unlike how wolfman operate . It ’s a cardinal dogma of modern vampire tropes , but it ’s another chemical element that is n’t a core principle of real - world folklore .
Count Orlok bites to bung , and oftentimes bolt down his dupe , as he does with Anna Harding ( presumably ) , her children , and ultimately Ellen Hutter . He also uses it as a agency of establishing control over people , which is what he does with Thomas Hutter . That is an ability that he does deal with some interpretations of Dracula , but Orlok does not have the power to make other creatures like himself with his bite .
5Personality
Dracula Is Charming And Personable, Orlok Is Intimidating And Creepy
Along with being able to physically pass for a human , Dracula is really charming . In the novel , Jonathan Harker makes particular note of how gracious and take in his server is when he first arrives at Dracula ’s castle , and it ’s a specify characteristic of Bela Lugosi , Christopher Lee , and Gary Oldman ’s portrayals of him . Orlok is the opposite ; he literally haunts each room that he ’s in , and moves Thomas Hutter to tear just from the fear he feels from their conversation . He ’s terrifying , unsettling , and notably scant and abrasive in conversation .
4Shape-shifting Ability
Dracula Can Take Many Forms, While Orlok Is Restricted To His Body
Dracula in reality has a redoubtable stalls of power and ability , the most fantastical of which is his power to shapeshift . Dracula is famously able to call on into a chiropteran , but the most in - deepness descriptions and depictions of the character line thathe can also become a large dog or wolf , and even metamorphose into a fine mist , or a dust that go in beam of moonlight . Orlok has no such transformative ability ; as a walking corpse , he ’s restricted to the torso in which his soulfulness is still trapped . He has some clear psychical ability , but nothing as extravagant as shapeshifting .
3Weaknesses
Dracula Is Actively Repelled By Garlic And Religious Objects, While There Is No Evidence Orlok Is
Dracula famously can be disgust by garlic or religious item , and dissimilar iterations of the lineament have been warded off with crosses , holy communion wafer , and holy water . As a wholly evil and hellish wight , anything that carries a grace will repel Dracula , and garlic was believed to interpose with his common sense of smell . While none of those items are enough to kill the infernal Count , they have been read to glow him if they touch his tegument .
European impression surrounding vampires point that as vampires were make by a stock disease , an antibiotic ( like that compound found in garlic ) would be able to kill a vampire , which is at last where the trope of vampires hating garlic was born .
There is no grounds that Count Orlok stomach from the same storey of intolerance as Draculawhen it comes to holy point and garlic . Robert Eggers does make certain to represent the belief inNosferatu , however . In the inn that Thomas Hutter stay at , located at the foot of the Carpathian Mountains , locals can be seen using garlic to guard off evilness . The span he cross to approach Count Orlok ’s rook also has a hut at its foot that ’s loaded with crosses , implying local have place them there to keep Orlok at bay .
2Reaction To Sunlight
Sunlight Kills Orlok, It Merely Robs Dracula Of His Strength
One of the most visually arresting and memorable scene inNosferatuis thefinal encounter between Ellen and Orlok , in which Orlok meets his goal . She deal to trap him with her own body , and holds him in home until the sun turn out at dawn , take to a dramatic sequence in which Orlok ’s nerve thaw away in the sunlight . This is a callback to the originalNosferatu , which sees a similar sequence of case work out , ending with Nosferatu simply disappearing when the sunlight hit him . The idea that the sun kills vampires was born out ofNosferatu , in fact .
The early iteration of Dracula ca n’t be vote down by the sunshine , but are still undermine when exposed to it . The novel notes that he loses most of his sinful ability in the daylight hours , and Mina Harker specifically note that he loses his power to shapeshift during the daylight ( except at dawn , midday , or dusk ) . Many non - Dracula vampire moving picture have exaggerate the sun ’s effect on vampire , and typically make vulnerability to it completely deadly , as is the causa with Orlok .
1Romantic Nature
Dracula Is Debonair And Seductive, While Orlok Is Repulsive And Terrifying
Perhaps the most significant character difference of opinion between Dracula and Orlok is the implicit in romance , or lack thereof , of the two eccentric . The rationality that vampires have become so heavily sexualized is that many iterations of Dracula highlight that , between his appealingness , handsomeness , and pure evil , Dracula is pick up to the point of seduction . Dracula ’s cloaked , mystical nature comes across as debonair and tantalizing , and it ’s a foundational aspect of his fictional character on the big screen .
Nosferatumakes it clear that Orlok is entirely malevolent , as Dracula is , but he is far more direct about it .
Orlok represents the other side of vampirism : he is the animalistic embodiment of bloodlust and vicious iniquity that mark vampires as vessels of death . There is no romance involved with his floor , despite the candy kiss he divvy up with Ellen Hutter and their pseudo - wedding . For Orlok , his relationship with Ellen is about strong-arm and spiritual compulsion , luxuria , and control . There is nothing so pure as making love anywhere in the equation . Nosferatumakes it clean-cut that Orlok is entirely evil , as Dracula is , but he is far more direct about it .
Your Rating
Your scuttlebutt has not been saved
Cast
Nosferatu is a remaking of the 1922 silent film of the same name from director F. W. Murnau . Robert Eggers is craft his own variant of the story for the reboot as author and music director , with Bill Skarsgård ill-use into the shoe of Count Orlok . Nosferatu tells the narration of a young adult female who falls victim to a lamia absolutely infatuated with her .
