The Amityville Horror
The Amityville Horrorhas become a staple fibre of the repulsion genre , but there are numerous differences between the original book and the two films it directly inspired . free-base on a supposedly true story of a haunting in upstate New York , Jay Anson ’s bookThe Amityville Horrorbecame a smash hit when it was free in 1977 . This inspire 1979 ’s cinematic adaptation of the same name . asterisk James Brolin and Margot Kidder , the success of the picture show spawn a decade - spanningAmityville Horrorfranchise . The first film would be redo in 2005 , with Ryan Reynolds and Melissa George in the lead roles .
Although both reading of thehorror movie are based on the rightful storyfrom the book and share the same characters , there are somenotable dispute between the Christian Bible and the celluloid it inspire . This array from the lore surrounding the haunting to the particular of the upshot itself . There are even some ideas that only appear in the two films but not the book , and facet of the original book that were n’t recreated for the big blind . Here are the vainglorious differences between the various unlike version ofThe Amityville Horror .
From Elm Street to Amityville , these houses , manors , and more are some of the most iconic set piece in the genre .
10The Amityville Horror Opens Differently Between Versions
The Book & 2005 Remake Are More Overtly “Based On A True Story”
One of the biggest differences betweenThe Amityville Horrorcomes at the very beginning of the first cinematic adaptation , withthe original book and the 2005 film heavily leaning into the " true crime " elements of the history . The Amityville Horrortakes inspiration from the existent - living events of the DeFeo murders . The al-Qur’an ’s opening chapters are largely about that true criminal offense , relay the facts of the example . The 2005 film reinforces this element of the floor during a collage following the photographic film ’s opening , show up newsworthiness footage of the event and highlighting how the film is " base on true events . "
By contrast , the 1979 reading ofThe Amityville Horroris a more character - driventhat does n’t lean so heavily into that aspect of the story . While the film does reaffirm the real - life origins of the issue , the film is more focused on the Lutz family move into the home , skipping the closer attention to naturalistic detail that appear in the other two versions of the story . This plant up the 1979 ’s film to be a more standard revulsion motion-picture show , while the book and 2005 moving picture tried to spotlight that the repugnance that barrack the cinema has tangible - macrocosm inspirations .
9The Nature Of The Amityville Hauntings Are Different
There Are Way More Ghostly Sightings In The 2005 Film
While all three versions ofThe Amityville Horrorfeature a supernatural force within the Amityville house , the exact specifics of that entity are different in the two picture . In the original storey and the 1979 photographic film , the front is seemingly demonic in nature . The entity possess the sign is softly mysterious and grave , tug George to the verge of madness and targeting the family . The 1979 films link this to a mysterious John Ketchum , who conducted demonic rituals on the land . This demonic influence is unlike in the 2005 celluloid , which instead features more overt hauntings .
The 2005 picture show features the spirit of Reverend Jeremiah Ketcham , a deplorable figure from centuries before whose influence takes over George and unleash him on the rest of the family in the coming of that film . The 2005 movie also features the ghost of Jodie DeFeo , who haunts the family but is imply to be doing so in part to scare them aside from the same supernatural forces that led to her phratry ’s death .
8The 2005 Amityville Horror Is More Focused On The Family Dynamics
George’s Drama With The Family Is More Pronounced In 2005’s Remake
One factor ofThe Amityville Horrorthat is consistent throughout all three version is the presence of the Lutz family . George and Kathy Lutz are recently married , with the latter having three children from a previous marriage . That detail does n’t factor out heavily into the rule book or the 1979 movie , as the family is more or less united . However , the 2005 version ofThe Amityville Horrorleans more intemperately into the tensionsbetween George and his new step - children .
Main Characters OfThe Amityville Horror(2005 )
Cast
Custom Image by Debanjana Chowdhury
Kathy Lutz
Melissa George
George Lutz
Ryan Reynolds
Billy Lutz
Jesse James
Michael Lutz
Jimmy Bennett
Chelsea Lutz
Chloë Grace Moretz
Jodie DeFeo
Isabel Conner
The Amityville Horror is a 2005 horror film directed by Andrew Douglas. It stars Ryan Reynolds and Melissa George as George and Kathy Lutz, who move into a house in Amityville, New York, only to experience disturbing paranormal activities. The film is a remake of the 1979 classic and is based on the purportedly true events that inspired Jay Anson’s book of the same name.
This is clearest with the watershed betweenGeorge and the oldest of Kathy ’s children , Billy . The two have multiple combative moment during the film , and an increasingly unsound George even quietly threatens Billy in the 2005 picture . While the George of the 1979 film became more fast-growing and short - tempered the longer they stay in the star sign , he never became as full-grown of a menace as 2005 George did .
These repugnance theme songs are some of the good in the genre , but are often overlooked , as fans first lean to think of horror root word like Halloween ’s .
7The Priest Is Different In Each Amityville Horror
The Priest In 1979’sThe Amityville HorrorHas The Roughest Time Of All Three
In all three versions ofThe Amityville Horror , the archtypical repugnance movie priestcomes to the house to try and hallow it only to be repealed and ward off by whatever supernatural effect is obsess the building . However , the extent of the supernatural onset andthe identity of the priestis dissimilar in all three version of the story . Father Mancuso appear in the Koran and hears a voice postulate he get out of the building . His attempts to warn the Lutzs over the phone is burn short , and he suffers from pyrexia and bleb . Ultimately , Mancuso break loose largely unscathed .
By dividing line , Father Delaney in the 1979 film is accosted with imagination of fly before he can bless the house . The hauntings carry on , and Delaney does n’t just suffer from fevers and blister . His car eventually goes haywire and he even finish up blind . Father Callaway appear in the 2005 movie and experiences interchangeable premonitions to Delaney , but is spared the harsh attacks that occurred in the original motion picture . or else , he reappears later in the film to warn the Lutz category to fly .
6The Marching Band Doesn’t Appear In The 2005 Film
A Great Musical Scare Isn’t In The 2005 Remake
One of the more memorable way that George experiences the haunting of the Amityville House in both the original book and the 1979 cinema admit a occult melodious noise that entice him below . In the Word of God , George is woken by the sound of an entire march dance band downstairs . When he give way to insure it out , he finds that all the furniture has been move in the living way , as if to make outer space for a expectant grouping of the great unwashed . By direct contrast , the 1979 film features a cryptic drummingthat brings George downstairs instead of an full band .
This is one of the best scare in the 1979 moving picture , an unsettling music turn that ab initio seems to be part of the soundtrack but steady proves to be knell in George ’s ears as well . This case of scare is absentminded from the 2005 film , which instead uses the ghostly apparition of people like Jodie to ghost George and other characters .
5The Ceramic Lion Is More Dangerous In The Amityville Book
The Lion Statue Is Way Creepier In The Book
One of the items that seem in the original motion-picture show and the record that inspired it is a ceramic lion . The carving actually appear multiple times in the literaryThe Amityville Horror , appearing all around the house and seemingly moving of its own pact . When George finally trips on the Leo , he seems to have a cleared insect bite mark on his foot . The book highlights these moments , make the social lion one of the absolved ways the haunting is chasing the family unit .
While there is a ceramic Leo in the first cinematic adaption ofThe Amityville Horrorand George does trip on it , the Leo the Lion is far less overt in the celluloid . Even the apparent insect bite fall guy on George ’s infantry is brushed aside , which is a major contrast from the book where the lion was a more prevalent piece of the haunting . Notably , the 2005 pic largely did away with the Leo , similar to the mysterious euphony . This allowed the moving picture to keep the focus more on the household and the outcome the ghostly hauntings were have on them .
The Amityville Horror dealership has over two - dozen picture that search the original execution so there are bound to be a few bad entries over the years .
4The Identity Of Jodie Differs From The Original Story In The 2005 Remake
How Jodie Was Reinvented From A Demon To A Ghost
In all three version ofThe Amityville Horror , a presence identified as Jodie plays a part in the story . In the original story and the 1979 film , Jodie is the unmistakable imaginary acquaintance of Missy . However , it ’s steady involve that Jodie is the demonic presence behind the haunting . Described in both versions as a fuzz with glow red middle , Jodie is implicitly the chief scourge ofThe Amityville Horror , even if it does n’t actively lash out the characters in the film . Jodie even follow the Lutz class when they fly the planetary house in the original book .
Jodie is reimagined in the2005Amityville Horrorremakeas one of the DeFeo kinsperson who is killed by her older blood brother Ronald . Jodie appears throughout the 2005 flick as the imaginary supporter of Chelsea Lutz , and ofttimes haunt the family . The picture coiffe up the theme thatJodie is less dangerous than her fiendish similitude in the Scripture and anterior film , implying that Jodie is in reality haunting the Lutz category in a bid to make them fly the theatre and spare them the gruesome fate that bechance her and her syndicate .
3The Babysitter Is Different In The Amityville Horror Films, And Isn’t In The Book At All
There’s No Teenager Who Gets Scared In The Original Book
Both cinematic version ofThe Amityville Horrorfeature a teenage babysitterwho watch over the Lutz children while their parents are out of the house . Functionally , they meet the same function and experience the haunting first - hand . However , their case are very different . In the 1979 plastic film , Jackie is an guiltless new cleaning woman play by Amy Wright who wears orthodontic headgear and is terrified by the satanic Jodie . By dividing line , the more sexualized Lisa is play by Rachel Nichols and is presented as a flirty contrast to Billy .
Notably , Lisa is straight direct by Jodie and left traumatize by the brush . The concept of a babysitter was an innovation of the filmsthat did n’t seem in the original rule book . While there are differences in the hauntings that appear in both the book and the films , this is one of the most obvious unique elements that was n’t in the book .
2The Haunted Land Gives Each Amityville A Different Origin
The True Origins Of The Amityville Hauntings Differ From Story To Story
All three version ofThe Amityville Hauntingreveal that the land the theater is built upon is curse , giving the supernatural events a direct explanation . However , all three remainder up deviating from one another in that Book of Revelation . In the book , the area is a location where local aboriginal American kinship group would send out their unwell ( both physically and mentally ) . In the 1979 film , the house is revealed to be fabricate atop a Shinnecock inhumation ground and was previously the home of an infamous Satanic worshipper , John Ketchum .
The 2005 version ofThe Amityville Horroramplifies this chemical element by bring out the house was alsothe web site of occult arts experimentation by Reverend Jeremiah Ketcham , who bear dark acts on the site in the seventeenth hundred . The 2005 film effectively turns Ketcham into the overarching source of the saturnine events surrounding the sign of the zodiac , even overtly possessing George towards the oddment of the film and turning him against his category .
1George’s Role In The Finale Of The Amityville Horror Differs
The George Of 2005’s Film Is Far More Dangerous
George is one of the main characters in all three versions ofThe Amityville Horror , and his personality is seemingly impact by the supernatural element at play in the story . However , all three play unlike roles in the final stretching of the story . In the original book , George is n’t possess like his movie counterparts and rather flees the house with the relief of the category . This is a direct line to his actions in both movies , where he is shortly taken over by a supernatural military force and turned against his have intercourse ones .
In the 1979 movie , George almost attacks the family with an axe but is talked down by Kathy , restoring him and allow George to help the family escape the house . The George of the 2005 film is far more touched by the possession . On top of being fooled into pour down the family dog-iron , he ends up attack the family so feverishly that he has to be tap out by Kathy . These change highlight the different ways the cinematic variant ofThe Amityville Horrorremix the original floor for more visceral scares .
Your Rating
Your comment has not been make unnecessary
The Amityville Horror is the first film in the long - run horror franchise . In the original 1979 film , a family moves into a home where class prior , a brutal slaying was committed . Quickly after move in , they set about to experience supernatural consequence that take a cost on the father ’s saneness . James Brolin and Margot Kidder ace as the newlyweds George and Kathy Lutz .
The Amityville Horror is a 2005 horror film guide by Andrew Douglas . It stars Ryan Reynolds and Melissa George as George and Kathy Lutz , who move into a house in Amityville , New York , only to go through disturbing extrasensory activities . The film is a remake of the 1979 classic and is based on the purportedly unfeigned events that exhort Jay Anson ’s record book of the same name .
