Gilmore Girls
WhileGilmore Girlswasn’t complete , the failure of the show ’s Netflix revivalA Year In The Lifeproves that the original show got one thing right . Gilmore Girls ’ cast of characterswasn’t always easy to root for . Lorelei ’s parent were wrong about her inability to raise Rory , but there is no deny that Rory ’s mother could be uncaring , flighty , and bad with boundaries when it came to her daughter . likewise , although the total town of Stars Hollow would have defended her every action with their lives , it is hard to deny that Rory was a serial beguiler .
Although Rory ’s fate in A Year in the Life seemed to come out of nowhere , Gilmore Girls time of year 1 subtly foretell this eventual determination .
These flaws made the show ’s heroes complex , relatable , and believably human , but they were n’t always sympathetic . This knead throughout the show ’s original rivulet , sinceLorelei’sGilmore Girlsbackstoryjustified her mercenary moments of self - focus on behaviour and Rory ’s fault ensured she was n’t a slow , one - dimensional gilded child . However , these same traits were amplified in the show ’s 2016 revival and this resulted in the Netflix miniseries receiving a very dissimilar receipt . Gilmore young woman : A Year In The Lifealso changed something else about the series , and it was this alteration that really doomed the revival .
Gilmore Girls: A Year In The Life Completely Changed The Tone Of The Original Show
A Year In The Life Was More Cynical Than Gilmore Girls
Gilmore Girls : A Year in the Lifewas nowhere near as fun as the original show , and the tonal disparity betweenGilmore Girlsand its revival was what sink the miniseries . AlthoughGilmore Girlsoften tackled serious topics , the show ’s playful tone was cardinal to its status as a cult hit . Gilmore Girlsnever became too dark , even when dealing with storylines like Rory and Lorelei ’s feud or Lorelei ending her engagement to Luke . In contrast , Gilmore girl : A yr In The Lifewas in a flash hopeless in comparson to its precursor , even though the miniseries also paradoxically lacked fight .
plot of land likeMitchum distinguish Rory she did n’t havewhat it took to be a journalist bear witness that the originalGilmore Girlshad heap of harsh storylines . However , althoughGilmore Girls : A class In The Lifedidn’t lineament any moments this biting , the serial had an altogether meaner , more downbeat tone . Rory was no longer an irrepressible dreamer but had instead become a sulfurous burnout . The “ Thirtysomething ring ” were n’t quirky outcasts like most of the residents of Stars Hollow , but rather the revival ’s dour jab at millennials . Put simply , Gilmore Girlswas no longer fun .
A Year In The Life’s Serious Nature Made The Netflix Revival Disappointing
The Gilmore Girls Revival Never Successfully Recaptured The Original Show’s Tone
WhileGilmore Girls : A Year In The Lifewas always live to have its obscure moments , the revival ’s tone was a mess . Gilmore girl : A Year In The Lifefelt darker than the original show , but not in a direction that flesh out the heroines or reveal antecedently unobserved elements of their personality . Rory and Lorelei nonchalantly fat - shaming Stars Hollow locals at a swimming pool was n’t a cunning deconstruction of their original personae . rather , it was just a nastier , less fun , and less funny version of the beloved quality . likewise , Jason ’s counter highlight the resurgence ’s failure .
Gilmore young woman : A Year In The Lifewas released in 2016 , nine days after the original show ended .
Throughout his persona in the original series , Jason was one of Lorelei ’s more magnetic love interests . Chris Eigeman ’s character couple Lorelei ’s offbeat personality and shared her unearthly mother wit of humour , but his appearance inGilmore Girls : A Year In The Lifeshowed none of his usual mentality or charm . It was n’t clear why Jason reappeared for this brief cameo , but his firm , awkward interaction with Lorelei epitomized the difference between the original show and its revival . Gilmore Girls : A Year In The Lifedropping Sookiehad a exchangeable feel , as a character who was in the first place pivotal became sidelined .
Custom image by Debanjana Chowdhury
Gilmore Girls' Tone Is A Huge Reason For The Original Series' Success
Gilmore Girls Balanced Drama, Comedy, and Romance In Its Original Run
Lorelei and Sookie eventually partake the screen in the revival , but theGilmore Girls : A Year In The Lifescene is so off - putt and cumbersome that viewers might care they had n’t . Outside of Richard ’s off - blind death , there is not that much tragedy to makeGilmore Girls : A class In The Lifedarker than the original show . Gilmore Girlsdealt with Lorelei ’s legion grief and Rory ’s academic struggles as well as her fail romantic kinship , so it is not like the revival was uniquely saturnine in its subject matter . Instead , tone alone was the problem .
The original series was a offbeat , swooning - hearted dramedy .
Gilmore Girls : A yr In The Lifeproved just how much the tone ofGilmore Girlsshaped its success . The original serial was a quirky , idle - hearted dramedy that used the zany denizens of Stars vacuous to keep things fun whenever the love lives of the show ’s heroines became too spectacular . In contrast , the revival made Lorelei and Rory more bitter and uncaring , and Stars Hollow was no longer the idyllic burg of the original show . Thus , A Year In The Lifefailed to retake the unique collection ofGilmore Girls .
